HERN Project Website 2005
The overall relationship between HE and Society is changing from minority/exclusive to majority/inclusive and from state funded/protected to market-driven/competitive. But the pace (and sometimes even the direction) of these changes does not fit a simple policy algorithm. The relationship between 'higher education' and 'society' is the product of the immediate environment within which each institution operates, which may range from local to global and which is subject to statutory and customary influences that are always complex and often historically rooted. Any 'European' dimension tends to spring from these historical roots. The value to higher education of belonging to a growing European community presently appears to be appreciated more by newly joined states, particularly because HE is one of the few areas where there is a shared agenda for change.
Change in European HE cannot be 'managed' centrally. At best it can be influenced through mechanisms that legitimately operate at a supra-national level. Ensuring the portability of qualifications is one key driver as is the establishment of common definitions that allow one system to be compared with another or for national actions on inclusion or access to be bench-marked at the European level. And in some areas, such as establishing definitions of what constitutes a disability, there may be a need to provide a statutory, though still flexible, framework.
The test of how well higher education meets the needs of the European Knowledge Society is in its outputs, not its methods or organisation. Rewarding those who produce valued outputs will produce change: as can be seen in those areas of HE, especially SET, where funding is linked to clear objectives. But what, eactly, are the outputs of higher education needed by a European Knowledge Society? To what extent do these differ from HE's present outputs? And who decides what these outputs should be - the academics? the HEI? expert committees? the market/end users?